<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>NAMPI Member Portal | Joan Senatore | Activity</title>
	<link>https://staging.member.nampi.net/members/jsenatore/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://staging.member.nampi.net/members/jsenatore/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Joan Senatore.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2025 17:54:03 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.9.30</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">06066df3a669d96757fe51d591c680cc</guid>
				<title>Joan Senatore posted an update: Massachusetts has a question relative to how other [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://staging.member.nampi.net/news-feed/p/2246/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2023 13:03:40 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Massachusetts has a question relative to how other states conduct their utilization management medical records reviews; such as, do you conduct them yourselves, do you use a vendor, i.e, peer review organization, do they use a statistical sample, on-site vs desk review?  Basically, we are interested in hearing about your process and how we&hellip;</p>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2246"><a href="https://staging.member.nampi.net/news-feed/p/2246/" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6d52109b28c992b4cce30272f7a566dc</guid>
				<title>Joan Senatore replied to the discussion CMS Eligibility Contact in the forum State Only Forum</title>
				<link>https://staging.member.nampi.net/nampi-member-forums/discussion/cms-eligibility-contact/#post-1883</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2023 16:55:53 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://staging.member.nampi.net/nampi-member-forums/discussion/cms-eligibility-contact/#post-1883"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> CMS Eligibility Contact</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>I agree.  There are so many unanswered questions. The States need direction and guidance as well as interpretation of FAQ#31.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		